I recently read Dan Brown’s novel Inferno, which centers on Malthusian theory about population growth outpacing resource availability.

The Malthusian Problem

The novel’s plot involves a character who accepts Malthus’s premise that “geometric population growth” would eventually exceed linear resource growth, leading to catastrophe.

Why Malthus Was Wrong (So Far)

Humanity has avoided the predicted collapse through scientific advancement, particularly the Green Revolution. However, this progress relied on fossil fuels—a finite resource.

Population Stabilization

There’s evidence suggesting developed societies produce fewer children, with global population expected to stabilize around 2050, potentially providing centuries to develop solutions.

Alternative Concerns

I’d argue overpopulation is less pressing than climate change and energy security. I also question the romanticized notion that pandemics (like the Black Plague) benefit humanity overall.

Personal Note

I studied engineering physics in college and have limited formal humanities education, making my engagement with Dan Brown’s interdisciplinary thriller particularly interesting.